Back to Journals » Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare » Volume 17
Artificial Intelligence, the Digital Surgeon: Unravelling Its Emerging Footprint in Healthcare – The Narrative Review
Authors Shang Z, Chauhan V, Devi K , Patil S
Received 14 June 2024
Accepted for publication 9 August 2024
Published 15 August 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 4011—4022
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S482757
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Zifang Shang,1 Varun Chauhan,2 Kirti Devi,3 Sandip Patil4
1Guangdong Engineering Technological Research Centre of Clinical Molecular Diagnosis and Antibody Drugs, Meizhou People’s Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou, People’s Republic of China; 2Multi-Disciplinary Research Unit, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Greater Noida, India; 3Department of Medicine, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Greater Noida, India; 4Department Haematology and Oncology, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Sandip Patil, Department Haematology and Oncology, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-755-82008283, Email [email protected]
Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds transformative potential for the healthcare industry, offering innovative solutions for diagnosis, treatment planning, and improving patient outcomes. As AI continues to be integrated into healthcare systems, it promises advancements across various domains. This review explores the diverse applications of AI in healthcare, along with the challenges and limitations that need to be addressed. The aim is to provide a comprehensive overview of AI’s impact on healthcare and to identify areas for further development and focus.
Main Applications: The review discusses the broad range of AI applications in healthcare. In medical imaging and diagnostics, AI enhances the accuracy and efficiency of diagnostic processes, aiding in early disease detection. AI-powered clinical decision support systems assist healthcare professionals in patient management and decision-making. Predictive analytics using AI enables the prediction of patient outcomes and identification of potential health risks. AI-driven robotic systems have revolutionized surgical procedures, improving precision and outcomes. Virtual assistants and chatbots enhance patient interaction and support, providing timely information and assistance. In the pharmaceutical industry, AI accelerates drug discovery and development by identifying potential drug candidates and predicting their efficacy. Additionally, AI improves administrative efficiency and operational workflows in healthcare, streamlining processes and reducing costs. AI-powered remote monitoring and telehealth solutions expand access to healthcare, particularly in underserved areas.
Challenges and Limitations: Despite the significant promise of AI in healthcare, several challenges persist. Ensuring the reliability and consistency of AI-driven outcomes is crucial. Privacy and security concerns must be navigated carefully, particularly in handling sensitive patient data. Ethical considerations, including bias and fairness in AI algorithms, need to be addressed to prevent unintended consequences. Overcoming these challenges is critical for the ethical and successful integration of AI in healthcare.
Conclusion: The integration of AI into healthcare is advancing rapidly, offering substantial benefits in improving patient care and operational efficiency. However, addressing the associated challenges is essential to fully realize the transformative potential of AI in healthcare. Future efforts should focus on enhancing the reliability, transparency, and ethical standards of AI technologies to ensure they contribute positively to global health outcomes.
Keywords: artificial intelligence, healthcare innovation, medical imaging, predictive analytics, clinical decision support
Introduction
The utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare has seen a remarkable rise, transforming from a niche interest of data scientists and bioinformaticians to a mainstream tool with broad applications. Initially, AI-derived technologies were not widely accessible to the general public due to a lack of awareness, limited availability of high-end processors, and lesser understanding of artificial neural networks (ANN).1 However, the past few decades have witnessed a rapid evolution and expansion of AI’s role in healthcare. A review of the literature reveals a significant increase in the number of studies related to AI in healthcare, with a timeline plot on PubMed showing over 32,431 items from 1967 to date (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=AI%20healthcareandtimeline=expanded). This growing interest is evident across various article types, including reviews, clinical trials, and systematic reviews.
AI is now poised to revolutionize the healthcare sector by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, optimizing treatment planning, and improving patient outcomes. Its applications are vast, ranging from drug development and medical imaging to the management of electronic health records (EHR) and personalized medicine2 (Figure 1). In medical imaging, advanced deep-learning algorithms assist in the early detection and treatment of diseases,3 allowing radiologists to prioritize critical cases and reduce diagnostic errors, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes.
![]() |
Figure 1 Artificial Intelligence (AI) vs Machine Learning (ML) vs Neural Network vs Deep Learning. |
Moreover, AI contributes to risk prediction, decision-making, and patient stratification by utilizing machine learning (ML) techniques and natural language processing (NLP) to extract valuable insights from unstructured data.4 The field of drug discovery has also been revolutionized, as AI aids in screening potential drugs, predicting their efficacy and toxicity, and accelerating the identification of promising candidates.
Despite these advancements, several challenges remain in fully integrating AI into clinical practice. Key issues include the need for robust validation of AI algorithms, ensuring data privacy and security, and achieving transparency and explainability in AI-driven decision-making processes. Though AI has significant benefits, several challenges remain in integrating these technologies into clinical settings. This review aims to explore AI’s current advancements and challenges by focusing on specific healthcare applications where AI’s impact is particularly notable The key topics such as drug development, medical imaging, EHRs, and personalized medicine will be addressed. By examining these areas, we aim to provide a detailed understanding of AI’s contributions and the obstacles that must be overcome to fully realize its potential in healthcare.
Medical Imaging and Diagnostics
The use AI algorithms has gained significant attention in revolutionizing medical imaging and diagnostics such as X-rays, CT scans, and MRI scans, by assisting in image interpretation, enhancing precision, and early disease identification with enhanced accuracy and efficiency. AI-related tools can aid radiologists and clinicians in recognizing patterns and anomalies, thus supplementing accurate and timely diagnosis. AI algorithms may assist in identifying abnormalities and diseases by analysing medical images. For example, the AI-based algorithms helped radiologists in the detection of lung nodules in chest X-rays and CT scans5 and in classifying breast cancer lesions in mammograms with higher precision.6 Similarly, some AI tools have been developed which can analyse brain MRI scans and may help in the identification of neurological disorders like Alzheimer’s disease and multiple sclerosis.7 Furthermore, AI algorithms have shown promise in the diagnosis of pneumonia and other respiratory conditions by improving the interpretation of chest X-rays for.8 AI-powered segmentation has shown effectiveness in medical imaging modalities. For instance, automated segmentation of liver tumours in MRI and CT scans is feasible using AI-based algorithms.9 Also, the tumour-affected precise delineation of brain regions can be monitored using AI-powered segmentation of brain MRI scans, thus enhancing treatment planning and disease progression.10 In addition, AI-based tools have shown their utility in disease assessment and monitoring by automated quantification of disease markers, such as measuring tumour size or quantifying brain volumes in neuroimaging.1 Recently, a study demonstrated the importance of AI in improving the decision-making and accurate diagnosis of a 27-year-old woman who reported chest pain, by improving the X-ray image, displaying it as an AI-generated Swiss cheese with better resolution and feasibility, thus lessening the chances of human errors.11 Also, the quantification of cardiac function and diagnosing of cardiovascular conditions is possible using AI-driven segmentation of cardiac MRI images.12 The AI has also shown its promise in early detection of lung cancer and monitoring of tumour growth by AI-based segmentation of lung nodules.13 The AI-based algorithms can make predictive models by integrating the radiomics data into clinical data, by extracting a large number of quantitative features from medical images. Building such models may assist in anticipating the treatment response, prognosis, and disease outcomes.14 The AI-assisted high-resolution imaging of the retina has eased the diagnosis and recommended personalized medicines by ophthalmologists. Furthermore, AI-based radiomics have predicted the response to therapy and survival outcomes with higher accuracy in different types of cancers including prostate cancer, lung cancer and glioma.15,16 Recently, a study demonstrated that AI-assisted tools have reduced the burden of radiologists to three-fifths in screening for breast cancer while avoiding false negatives by over 25%. Thus, the AI assisted imaging tools hold promises in breast cancer screening with higher accuracy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a rapid surge of chest imaging led to the optimization of AI tools its detection and management.17 The AI-based tools could reduce noise and artefacts in low-quality medical images and thus may enhance the image details.17 For example, Deep learning-based methods have been developed which could enhance the low-dose of CT images by reducing radiation exposure.18 Even AI algorithms could enable better visualization and interpretation of medical images by improving the quality of low-resolution medical images.19
Clinical Decision Support
AI may aid healthcare professionals in clinical decision-making by helping with treatment recommendations and predicting patient outcomes by analysing patient data, medical records, and relevant literature. Certain AI algorithms have been developed which may aid in diagnosing diseases by analysing medical images and patients’ clinical information. For example, deep learning algorithms have been developed which can analyse dermoscopic images and have demonstrated the diagnosis of skin cancer with higher accuracy.3 Furthermore, AI-based decision support systems have been developed which may provide guidance to clinicians in interpreting medical images and assist in diagnosing conditions like pneumonia and diabetic retinopathy.8,20 AI models can analyse patient data and generate risk scores or predict outcomes. For instance, ML algorithms have been used to predict the risk of cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks, based on patient demographics, medical history, and biomarkers.21 AI-driven tools have been developed to predict disease progression and prognosis in conditions like cancer, enabling personalized treatment planning.22 AI algorithms can analyse large datasets of patient outcomes, treatment responses, and clinical guidelines to recommend optimal treatment plans. This can assist healthcare professionals in selecting appropriate therapies and dosage adjustments.20 AI-based decision support systems have been developed to assist in selecting the most effective medication or treatment options based on patient characteristics, genetic information, and previous treatment responses.23 AI systems can analyse vast amounts of medical literature and clinical guidelines to provide evidence-based recommendations and guidelines at the point of care. This helps clinicians stay updated with the latest research and adhere to best practices.24 AI-driven tools can assist in identifying potential drug interactions, adverse events, and contraindications based on patient medication profiles and medical history.25 AI algorithms can continuously monitor patient data, such as vital signs, lab results, and sensor data, to detect anomalies and provide real-time alerts to healthcare professionals. This enables early detection of critical conditions and timely interventions.26
Predictive Analytics
AI may play an important role in predictive analytics by capitalizing ML techniques and advanced algorithms to examine large volumes of data and make projections about future events or outcomes. By analysing the patient’s data including demographic details, medical history, biomarkers etc, the AI-based algorithms can predict the menace of developing certain diseases or medical conditions. For example, certain AI algorithms have been developed which can predict the risk of developing certain diseases like cancer, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, by analysing the characteristics of individual patients.27 AI has showcased stellar prowess in prediction, diagnosis and prognosticating colorectal cancer.28 Recently a study showed that AI-assisted machine learning approaches accurate detection of preoperative lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer.29 In addition, AI-based risk prediction models have also been developed to identify individuals who have a higher risk of readmission or complications in healthcare settings, enabling pre-emptive strategies and patient-centred care designs.30 AI algorithms have been developed that can predict individual responses to specific treatments by analysing genetic profiles, clinical parameters, and treatment histories of the patient. This will help healthcare professionals in optimizing treatment plans enabling personalized medicine to patients.31 AI-based predictive models have been developed which may allow tailored treatment strategies by predicting the response to chemotherapy in cancer patients.32 Certain AI-based algorithms have been developed which can predict the clinical outcomes for individual patients, including, any complications, disease progression, hospital length of stay, predicting mortality, etc aiding in early detection and intervention.2 For example, some AI-based models have shown potential in predicting patient outcomes in clinical conditions such as sepsis, heart failure, and acute kidney injury.33 Several research articles have demonstrated the prediction of outbreaks of seasonal viruses like COVID-19, Zika, Ebola etc using deep learning and ML algorithms.34 Even AI-based techniques can assist in accelerating the drug discovery and development process, by analysing enormous biochemical data, thus identifying promising drug candidates, predicting its toxicity and efficacy, analysing drug-target interactions, and optimizing drug designing.26,35
Robot-Assisted Surgery
AI-driven robots can execute surgical tasks with higher accuracy, assisting in complex surgical procedures, escalating precision, minimizing invasiveness, and enhancing outcomes. AI also plays an important role in improving surgical capabilities, enhancing precision, and enabling better patient outcomes.36 AI-based algorithms can analyse CT scans and MRI imaging data and can generate 3D anatomical models, thus assisting in better planning of complex surgical operations and simulating potential outcomes. For example, virtual surgical scenario modelling, tumour segmentation, and identifying anatomical structures.37,38 AI-based image recognition tools can represent real-time live images of the operative area, thus assisting surgeons in seeing better visual guidance during robotic surgeries, thus improving the accuracy of the surgical procedures.39 AI algorithms can also assist surgeons in decision making like predicting surgical complications estimating surgical time, and identifying potential risks during robot-assisted procedures by analysing data, surgical records and outcomes of the patient.40 AI algorithms can recommend surgical workflows and postoperative care by analysing large datasets of surgical cases.41 AI tools can monitor post-operative recovery progress by analysing patient vitals and lab results and may provide early warnings, thus facilitating timely interventions.42 The data discussed so far suggests the emerging role of AI in robot-assisted surgery, however, there are still many gaps which need to be filled to improve precision and validation of the tools for successful integration into surgical practices.
Virtual Assistants and Chatbots
AI-enabled virtual assistants and chatbots can assist in improving patient engagement and accessibility to healthcare facilities by providing healthcare information like setting up appointments, answering frequently asked queries, providing basic medical information and scheduling appointments.43,44 AI can assist in finding the right healthcare protocols in a shorter time frame by analysing the patient’s health records (medical history) prioritising patients based on the severity and urgency of the disease and getting help in time.45,46 Virtual assistants may encourage healthy behaviours by providing coaching and feedback to patients with chronic illnesses and providing personalized reminders.47 AI may detect the emotional states of the patients with VA and chatbots and could provide necessary support and interventions including exercises, connecting patients to mental health services, and providing resources for stress management.48,49 Furthermore, AI assistance could reduce the waiting time for the patient by assisting in scheduling appointments and identifying and suggesting the best possible healthcare service, thus improving overall patient care.50,51
Drug Discovery and Development
AI-based algorithms can assist in the acceleration of drug discovery by analysing enormous clinical data, including their genetic composition, molecular structures and clinical trial information. Different AI-based algorithms including ML, deep learning, deep neural networks (DNNs), virtual screening, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSRL) technologies, recurrent neural networks (RNNs), support vector machines (SVMs), deep virtual screening, etc. have been employed for screening and designing of drugs.52 AI can assist in optimizing drug design, identifying potential drug targets and predicting their toxicity and efficacy.53 AI algorithms can speed up the identification of potential drug molecules by analysing the binding affinity of numerous chemical compounds from any database to the drug targets, thus narrowing down the list of promising compounds and selecting the potential compounds with higher affinity to the target molecules utilizing deep learning models.54,55 Even the potential drug targets can also be identified by AI tools which can analyse the genomic and proteomic data and facilitate the discovery of novel therapeutic targets.35 The novel drug molecules with desired properties can be generated and optimized by molecular optimization techniques using AI algorithms.56 ML algorithms can improve treatment strategies by identifying drug combinations with synergistic effects by analysing molecular and clinical data.57 AI algorithms can improve clinical trial efficiency by optimizing and designing a clinical trial protocol by analysing the patient’s data and recommending the trial inclusion criteria, critical endpoints, and dosage determination.58 AI algorithms utilizing deep learning models can predict the safety and toxicity of drugs by analysing their biological profiles and structural information, thus improving patient safety by identifying potential adverse events in an early phase of drug discovery.59
Healthcare Administration and Operations
AI tools can improve the operational efficiency of administrative tasks by streamlining methods like appointment scheduling, claims processing, billing, enhancing decision-making etc, thus reducing the burden on clinical staff (Figure 2).60,61 AI algorithms can analyse the historical data of patients and may reduce fraudulent activities in healthcare by detecting any anomalies and patterns.62 Furthermore, risk management can also be taken care of by using AI-assisted ML methods which can predict the readmissions of patients by assessing their risk profiles.63,64 AI tools like ML and NLP can also improve patient care by assessing the clinical data and identifying any patterns related to adverse events thus ensuring prevention them thus enhancing patient satisfaction.65,66 AI-assisted decision support systems can assist in providing evidence-based recommendations to healthcare professionals suggesting diagnosis and treatment protocol based on the patient data and clinical guidelines.67
![]() |
Figure 2 Applications of AI in healthcare. |
Remote Monitoring and Telehealth
Healthcare facilities in remote regions are frequently constrained due to long distances, lack of skilled healthcare professionals and poor infrastructure. As a result, the remote areas do experience delayed diagnosis, insufficient treatment and impoverished health outcomes. Virtual care services may be provided to patients in remote areas and recommended with consultations if needed using AI-powered Telehealth platforms.68 The progression and exacerbation of disease may be predicted from wearable devices and sensors using ML models aiding in personalised medication and proactive interventions.2 AI-assisted virtual assistants and chatbots can answer the patient’s queries and may advise with personalized healthcare thereby reducing the burden on healthcare professionals.69 Natural Language Processing (NLP) can extract the relevant conversation between patient and healthcare provider during teleconsultations and may assist in making treatment-related decisions and accurate diagnosis.70 Furthermore, AI-assisted computer-aided detection (CAD) systems can analyse CT/MRI scans and may assist radiologists in the detection and diagnosis of any complications with better accuracy.71 Even the pathology slides and medical imaging data can be analysed by AI-assisted deep learning algorithms aiding in the detection of disease in remotes.3 AI can even play a role in personalized rehabilitation by sensing the motion from wearable sensors thus monitoring and providing healthcare remotely.71,72 Also, the remote monitoring of older people in the context of movement patterns to detect falls and gait patterns and assess the risk of falls can be analysed by AI-assisted ML algorithms.73
Discussion and Summary Reflection
In the evolving landscape of healthcare, AI has emerged as a powerful tool with the potential to revolutionize various aspects of medical practice. From enhancing diagnostic precision in medical imaging to streamlining administrative processes, AI’s applications are broad and impactful. The integration of AI in healthcare has shown promise in improving patient outcomes, personalizing treatment strategies, and accelerating drug discovery. However, these advancements are accompanied by several challenges and limitations that must be addressed to fully harness AI’s potential.
Limitations
AI has proven to be very useful in healthcare, offering significant advancements and efficiencies; however, it comes with several limitations. One critical limitation is the current paucity of comprehensive, peer-reviewed evidence supporting AI’s efficacy and safety in clinical settings. Unlike traditional medical devices and treatments, AI technologies often lack the rigorous evidence typically required, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and robust randomized controlled trials. Deep learning models require vast amounts of high-quality data to function effectively, and poor data quality can lead to biased outputs.2,74 Achieving interoperability among disparate electronic health record (EHR) systems remains a significant challenge, as healthcare data often exists in isolated silos.75 Ethical concerns arise when AI models unintentionally produce unfair or discriminatory outcomes due to biased data.76 With AI’s increasing penetration into patient data, the risk of privacy exploitation escalates.77 The rapid expansion of AI in healthcare demands rigorous testing, validation, and standardization to ensure reliability and foster widespread adoption.78,79 Clear regulatory guidelines for AI-driven devices are also essential. The opaque nature of deep learning models, often described as “black boxes”, complicates trust and understanding among healthcare professionals, making it difficult to fully rely on them.80 Bridging the knowledge gap between healthcare professionals and AI tools is crucial for successful integration.81 Financial constraints pose challenges, especially in under-resourced regions, where maintaining and upgrading AI innovations can be daunting.82 Additionally, over-reliance on AI tools risks diminishing the clinical acumen of healthcare professionals.82
Potential Opportunities, Threats, Viable Options
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare presents vast opportunities, transforming the field significantly. AI’s application in medical imaging and diagnostics has greatly enhanced the accuracy and efficiency of disease detection. Advanced algorithms provide more precise diagnoses, crucial for conditions like cancer and cardiovascular diseases. AI also accelerates drug discovery by analyzing extensive biochemical and clinical data to predict drug efficacy and safety, reducing costs and expediting the development process. Additionally, AI-powered virtual assistants and chatbots improve patient engagement by offering real-time assistance, managing appointments, and delivering personalized health information, thereby supporting chronic disease management and overall patient care.
However, the use of AI in healthcare is not without challenges. Data privacy and security are significant concerns, as AI systems often require access to sensitive patient information, increasing the risk of data breaches. Robust cybersecurity measures and stringent data protection protocols are essential. Ethical issues, such as algorithmic bias, also pose challenges. AI systems may perpetuate biases from training data, leading to unfair outcomes. Transparency and fairness in algorithm development are necessary to ensure ethical compliance. The “black box” nature of many AI models further complicates matters, as their opaque decision-making processes can hinder trust and acceptance among healthcare professionals.
To address these challenges, several strategic approaches can be employed. Implementing comprehensive data protection frameworks and ensuring adherence to privacy regulations are crucial. AI systems should have built-in security features to prevent unauthorized access. Developing more interpretable AI models through techniques like explainable AI (XAI) can help demystify decision-making processes, making AI tools more accessible to healthcare professionals. Rigorous validation and standardization of AI algorithms are necessary to ensure reliability across diverse clinical settings. Establishing clear regulatory guidelines and conducting extensive testing can help mitigate risks and ensure ethical use.
Continuous education and training for healthcare professionals are also vital. Training programs can bridge the knowledge gap, promoting the effective integration of AI tools into clinical practice. Engaging healthcare practitioners in the development and evaluation of AI systems can ensure these tools meet real-world needs. Encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration among data scientists, clinicians, and ethicists can further enhance the development of innovative and ethically sound AI technologies.
In summary, while AI offers transformative opportunities in healthcare, addressing the associated threats is essential. This can be achieved through robust data protection, ethical algorithm development, and transparent model design. By adopting these viable options, the healthcare industry can leverage AI’s potential to improve patient outcomes and operational efficiency, navigating the challenges of this rapidly evolving field. Ensuring a balanced approach that prioritizes patient safety, ethical considerations, and technological innovation will be key to successfully integrating AI into healthcare.
Medicolegal Challenges in AI Integration
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare presents notable medicolegal challenges, particularly concerning liability in cases of diagnostic errors. As AI systems become increasingly involved in clinical decision-making, questions arise about who is responsible when these systems fail to correctly identify a condition or produce false positives.
Liability Issues
A critical medicolegal issue is determining liability when an AI diagnostic tool either fails to detect a condition (Type I error) or incorrectly identifies a condition that is not present (Type II error). The legal framework for these situations is still evolving. The question of liability—whether it lies with the clinician, the AI manufacturer, or both—remains largely unsettled. Studies have highlighted the need for clear legal guidelines to address these issues. For instance, da Fonseca83 discussed the liability implications of AI and machine learning in medical contexts, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive legal framework to address potential failures in AI systems.
Regulatory Frameworks
The current lack of regulatory frameworks for AI in healthcare exacerbates these challenges. Magrabi et al84 argue that AI tools used in clinical settings should be subject to the same rigorous scrutiny as other medical devices and treatments to ensure patient safety and efficacy. They advocate for the establishment of guidelines that ensure AI systems undergo thorough evaluation through peer-reviewed evidence, including systematic reviews and robust randomized controlled trials.
Ethical and Legal Considerations
Ethical and legal considerations must also address the potential for algorithmic bias and the “black box” nature of many AI models. Naik et al,85 discuss the ethical challenges of AI in healthcare, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability in AI systems to prevent unfair outcomes and build trust. They suggest that developing more interpretable AI models and incorporating ethical considerations into the design and deployment of AI tools can mitigate these issues.
To address these medicolegal challenges, incorporating best practices in AI integration is crucial. These practices aim to ensure that AI systems are both effective and aligned with legal and ethical standards. Addressing medicolegal challenges requires collaboration among healthcare providers, AI developers, legal experts, and policymakers. Establishing comprehensive guidelines and legal precedents will help delineate responsibilities and reduce uncertainty, ultimately facilitating the broader adoption of AI technologies in healthcare. In conclusion, understanding and resolving these medicolegal challenges is crucial for ensuring that AI can be effectively and safely integrated into clinical practice. By addressing these issues proactively, the healthcare industry can enhance the utility of AI while safeguarding patient care and upholding legal and ethical standards.
Socioeconomic Barriers to Accessing AI in Healthcare
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare has the potential to revolutionize patient care, yet it also raises significant socioeconomic concerns that can exacerbate existing health inequalities. Access to advanced AI technologies is not uniform across different populations, and socioeconomic factors play a crucial role in determining who benefits from these innovations.
Socioeconomic Barriers to Accessing AI in Healthcare
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare has the potential to revolutionize patient care, yet it also raises significant socioeconomic concerns that can exacerbate existing health inequalities. Access to advanced AI technologies is not uniform across different populations, and socioeconomic factors play a crucial role in determining who benefits from these innovations.
Health Inequality and AI Access
A primary concern is that AI technologies may deepen health disparities if access is limited by socioeconomic status. Patients in low-income or underserved communities may have less access to advanced healthcare technologies due to financial constraints or lack of infrastructure. This disparity can lead to unequal benefits from AI advancements, as those with greater resources are more likely to have access to the latest diagnostic tools and treatments. For instance, research by d’Elia et al,86 highlights that while AI can enhance diagnostic accuracy, its benefits are often skewed towards more affluent populations who have better access to healthcare services (Journal of Health Economics).
Economic Barriers
Economic barriers are a significant factor affecting AI adoption and access. The cost of implementing and maintaining AI systems can be prohibitive for many healthcare providers, especially those in low-resource settings. This economic disparity can result in a lack of availability of AI tools in underserved areas, further perpetuating health inequalities. Comunale and Manera87 discussed how the high costs associated with AI implementation can create a digital divide, where only certain populations reap the benefits of these technological advancements.
Policy Recommendations
Addressing these socioeconomic barriers requires targeted policies and interventions. Governments and healthcare organizations need to implement policies that promote equitable access to AI technologies. This includes funding and support for healthcare facilities in underserved areas, subsidizing the costs of AI tools, and developing training programs for healthcare professionals in these regions. Additionally, initiatives that focus on improving healthcare infrastructure in low-resource settings can help bridge the gap and ensure that AI technologies benefit all patients, regardless of their socioeconomic status. According to Gurevich et al,88 creating equitable access policies is essential for reducing health disparities and maximizing the benefits of AI in healthcare.
Conclusion
Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents transformative opportunities in healthcare, enhancing diagnostic accuracy, personalized treatment, and operational efficiency. To maximize these benefits, specific technical and practical challenges must be addressed.
Technical Implications: AI’s effectiveness in diagnostics and treatment relies on high-quality, diverse datasets to avoid biases and ensure broad applicability. In drug discovery, integrating comprehensive biochemical and clinical data is crucial for accurate predictions of drug interactions and safety. Medical imaging AI models need to balance performance with interpretability to provide actionable insights across different modalities.
Recommendations for Future Studies: Data Quality and Diversity: Expand datasets to include diverse patient populations and conditions, and explore data augmentation techniques to enhance model robustness.
Model Transparency: Develop explainable AI (XAI) methods to improve model interpretability and foster trust among clinicians.
Ethical and Regulatory Frameworks: Create robust guidelines for data privacy, fairness, and transparency in AI applications. Study the impact of these regulations on clinical practice.
Clinical Integration: Investigate strategies for integrating AI tools into clinical workflows and develop training programs to support healthcare professionals.
Real-World Evidence: Conduct longitudinal studies to evaluate the long-term impact of AI on patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Encourage collaboration between data scientists, clinicians, and ethicists to address technical challenges and align AI tools with clinical needs.
Data Sharing Statement
The data and materials used in this study are available upon request. Researchers interested in accessing the dataset or related materials for academic and non-commercial purposes can contact the corresponding author for further information.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
This study was supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (No. 2021A1515110793) and the Scientific Research Cultivation Project of Meizhou People’s Hospital (No. PY-C2023042).
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Akudjedu TN, Torre S, Khine R, Katsifarakis D, Newman D, Malamateniou C. Knowledge, perceptions, and expectations of Artificial intelligence in radiography practice: a global radiography workforce survey. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2023;54(1):104–116. doi:10.1016/j.jmir.2022.11.016
2. Rajkomar A, Oren E, Chen K, et al. Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records. NPJ Digit Med. 2018;1:18. doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0029-1
3. Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542(7639):115–118. doi:10.1038/nature21056
4. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44–56. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
5. Ardila D, Kiraly AP, Bharadwaj S, et al. End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography. Nat Med. 2019;25(6):954–961. doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0447-x
6. McKinney SM, Sieniek M, Godbole V, et al. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature. 2020;577(7788):89–94. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6
7. Saleem TJ, Zahra SR, Wu F, et al. Deep learning-based diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Pers Med. 2022;12(5):815. doi:10.3390/jpm12050815
8. Rajpurkar P, Irvin J, Zhu K, et al. CheXNet: radiologist-level pneumonia detection on chest X-rays with deep learning. arXiv preprint, arXiv. 2017. 2017:1. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1711.05225
9. Yasaka K, Akai H, Abe O, Kiryu S. Deep learning with convolutional neural network for differentiation of liver masses at dynamic contrast-enhanced CT: a preliminary study. Radiology. 2018;286(3):887–896. doi:10.1148/radiol.2017170706
10. Milletari F, Navab N, Ahmadi SA. V-net: fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation; 2016. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1606.04797.
11. Brown C, Nazeer R, Gibbs A, Le Page P, Mitchell AR. Breaking bias: the role of artificial intelligence in improving clinical decision-making. Cureus. 2023;15(3):e36415. doi:10.7759/cureus.36415
12. Bauer S, Wiest R, Nolte LP, Reyes M. A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(13):R97–129. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/R97
13. Dou Q, Chen H, Yu L. Automatic detection of cerebral microbleeds from MR Images via 3D convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016;35(5):1182–1195. doi:10.1109/TMI.2016.2528129
14. Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(4):441–446. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036
15. Aerts HJWL, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RTH, et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4006. doi:10.1038/ncomms5006
16. Kickingereder P, Burth S, Wick A, et al. Radiomic profiling of glioblastoma: identifying an imaging predictor of patient survival with improved performance over established clinical and radiologic risk models. Radiology. 2016;280(3):880–889. doi:10.1148/radiol.2016160845
17. Wang L, Lin ZQ, Wong A. COVID-Net: a tailored deep convolutional neural network design for detection of COVID-19 cases from chest X-ray images. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):19549. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76550-z
18. Kang E, Koo HJ, Yang DH, Seo JB, Ye JC. Cycle-consistent adversarial denoising network for multiphase coronary CT angiography. Med Phys. 2019;46(2):550–562. doi:10.1002/mp.13284
19. Hammernik K, Klatzer T, Kobler E, et al. Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79(6):3055–3071. doi:10.1002/mrm.26977
20. Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA. 2016;316(22):2402–2410. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.17216
21. Hu W, Yii FSL, Chen R, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of applying deep learning in the prediction of the risk of cardiovascular diseases from retinal images. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023;12(7):14. doi:10.1167/tvst.12.7.14
22. Chaudhary K, Poirion OB, Lu L, Garmire LX. Deep learning-based multi-omics integration robustly predicts survival in liver cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(6):1248–1259. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0853
23. Johnson AEW, Ghassemi MM, Nemati S, Niehaus KE, Clifton DA, Clifford GD. Machine learning and decision support in critical care. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng. 2016;104(2):444–466. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2015.2501978
24. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 2005;330(7494):765. doi:10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F
25. Olakotan OO, Yusof MM. Evaluating the alert appropriateness of clinical decision support systems in supporting clinical workflow. J biomed informat. 2020;106:103453. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103453
26. Kumar P, Chauhan S, Awasthi LK. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: review, ethics, trust challenges & future research directions. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2023;120:105894. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105894
27. Kavakiotis I, Tsave O, Salifoglou A, Maglaveras N, Vlahavas I, Chouvarda I. Machine learning and data mining methods in diabetes research. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2017;15:104–116. doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2016.12.005
28. Mansur A, Saleem Z, Elhakim T, Daye D. Role of artificial intelligence in risk prediction, prognostication, and therapy response assessment in colorectal cancer: current state and future directions. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1065402. doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1065402
29. Liu H, Zhao Y, Yang F, et al. Preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer with deep learning. BME Front. 2022;2022:9860179. doi:10.34133/2022/9860179
30. Ruppert MM, Loftus TJ, Small C, et al. Predictive modeling for readmission to intensive care: a systematic review. Crit Care Explor. 2023;5(1):e0848. doi:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000848
31. Turri G, Ostuzzi G, Vita G, et al. Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer in the era of total neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open. 2024;7(6):e2414702. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14702
32. Prelaj A, Miskovic V, Zanitti M, et al. Artificial intelligence for predictive biomarker discovery in immuno-oncology: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2024;35(1):29–65. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.125
33. Nemati S, Holder A, Razmi F, Stanley MD, Clifford GD, Buchman TG. An interpretable machine learning model for accurate prediction of sepsis in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(4):547–553. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002936
34. Bhattamisra SK, Banerjee P, Gupta P, Mayuren J, Patra S, Candasamy M. Artificial Intelligence in Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Research. Big Data Cognit Comput. 2023;7(1):10. doi:10.3390/bdcc7010010
35. Aliper A, Plis S, Artemov A, Ulloa A, Mamoshina P, Zhavoronkov A. Deep learning applications for predicting pharmacological properties of drugs and drug repurposing using transcriptomic data. Mol Pharm. 2016;13(7):2524–2530. doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00248
36. Rohde S, Münnich N. Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic and trauma surgery imaging. Orthopadie. 2022;51(9):748–756. doi:10.1007/s00132-022-04293-y
37. Messaoudi N, Gumbs AA. artificial intelligence surgery: how autonomous actions and surgiomics can decrease risk in high-risk surgery. In: Faintuch J, Faintuch S editors. Recent Strategies in High Risk Surgery. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024:605–620. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-56270-9_35
38. Navaratnam A, Abdul-Muhsin H, Humphreys M. Updates in urologic robot assisted surgery. F1000Res. 2018;7:F1000. doi:10.12688/f1000research.15480.1
39. Rus G, Andras I, Vaida C, et al. Artificial intelligence-based hazard detection in robotic-assisted single-incision oncologic surgery. Cancers. 2023;15(13):3387. doi:10.3390/cancers15133387
40. Hussain SM, Brunetti A, Lucarelli G, Memeo R, Bevilacqua V, Buongiorno D. Deep learning based image processing for robot assisted surgery: a systematic literature survey. IEEE Access. 2022;10:122627–122657. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3223704
41. Solanki SL, Pandrowala S, Nayak A, Bhandare M, Ambulkar RP, Shrikhande SV. Artificial intelligence in perioperative management of major gastrointestinal surgeries. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(21):2758–2770. doi:10.3748/wjg.v27.i21.2758
42. Stam WT, Ingwersen EW, Ali M, et al. Machine learning models in clinical practice for the prediction of postoperative complications after major abdominal surgery. Surg Today. 2023;53(10):1209–1215. doi:10.1007/s00595-023-02662-4
43. Liu J, Chang WC, Wu Y, Yang Y. Deep Learning for Extreme Multi-label Text Classification. In:
44. Vaidyam AN, Wisniewski H, Halamka JD, Kashavan MS, Torous JB. Chatbots and conversational agents in mental health: a review of the psychiatric landscape. Can J Psychiatry. 2019;64(7):456–464. doi:10.1177/0706743719828977
45. Siniscalchi KA, Broome ME, Fish J, et al. Depression screening and measurement-based care in primary care. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020;11:2150132720931261. doi:10.1177/2150132720931261
46. Barry MJ, Nicholson WK, Silverstein M; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for depression and suicide risk in adults: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2023;329(23):2057–2067. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.9297
47. Ambalavanan R, Snead RS, Marczika J, Kozinsky K, Aman E. Advancing the management of long COVID by integrating into health informatics domain: current and future perspectives. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(19):6836. doi:10.3390/ijerph20196836
48. Gaffney H, Mansell W, Tai S. Conversational agents in the treatment of mental health problems: mixed-method systematic review. JMIR Ment Health. 2019;6(10):e14166. doi:10.2196/14166
49. Brown LL, Lustria MLA, Rankins J. A review of web-assisted interventions for diabetes management: maximizing the potential for improving health outcomes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007;1(6):892–902. doi:10.1177/193229680700100615
50. Ma Y, Achiche S, Pomey MP, et al. Adapting and evaluating an ai-based chatbot through patient and stakeholder engagement to provide information for different health conditions: master protocol for an adaptive platform trial (the MARVIN Chatbots Study). JMIR Res Protoc. 2024;13:e54668. doi:10.2196/54668
51. Benjamen J, Girard V, Jamani S, et al. Access to refugee and migrant mental health care services during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a Canadian refugee clinician survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(10):5266. doi:10.3390/ijerph18105266
52. Selvaraj C, Chandra I, Singh SK. Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches for drug design: challenges and opportunities for the pharmaceutical industries. Mol Divers. 2022;26(3):1893–1913. doi:10.1007/s11030-021-10326-z
53. Blanco-González A, Cabezón A, Seco-González A, et al. The role of AI in drug discovery: challenges, opportunities, and strategies. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16(6):891. doi:10.3390/ph16060891
54. Vora LK, Gholap AD, Jetha K, Thakur RRS, Solanki HK, Chavda VP. Artificial Intelligence in Pharmaceutical Technology and Drug Delivery Design. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(7):1916. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15071916
55. Visan AI, Negut I. Integrating artificial intelligence for drug discovery in the context of revolutionizing drug delivery. Life. 2024;14(2):233. doi:10.3390/life14020233
56. Segler MHS, Kogej T, Tyrchan C, Waller MP. Generating focused molecule libraries for drug discovery with recurrent neural networks. ACS Cent Sci. 2018;4(1):120–131. doi:10.1021/acscentsci.7b00512
57. Abd El-Hafeez T, Shams MY, Elshaier YA, Farghaly HM, Hassanien AE. Harnessing machine learning to find synergistic combinations for FDA-approved cancer drugs. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):2428. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-52814-w
58. Zhang B, Zhang L, Chen Q, Jin Z, Liu S, Zhang S. Harnessing artificial intelligence to improve clinical trial design. Commun Med. 2023;3:191. doi:10.1038/s43856-023-00425-3
59. Lal A, Chiang ZD, Yakovenko N, Duarte FM, Israeli J, Buenrostro JD. Deep learning-based enhancement of epigenomics data with AtacWorks. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1507. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21765-5
60. Bajwa J, Munir U, Nori A, Williams B. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming the practice of medicine. Future Healthc J. 2021;8(2):e188–e194. doi:10.7861/fhj.2021-0095
61. Zeng Z, Deng Y, Li X, Naumann T, Luo Y. Natural language processing for ehr-based computational phenotyping. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf. 2019;16(1):139–153. doi:10.1109/TCBB.2018.2849968
62. Krishnan G, Singh S, Pathania M, et al. Artificial intelligence in clinical medicine: catalyzing a sustainable global healthcare paradigm. Front Artif Intell. 2023;6:1227091. doi:10.3389/frai.2023.1227091
63. Zheng B, Zhang J, Yoon SW, Lam SS, Khasawneh M, Poranki S. Predictive modeling of hospital readmissions using metaheuristics and data mining. Expert Syst Appl. 2015;42(20):7110–7120. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.066
64. Wang S, Zhu X. Predictive modeling of hospital readmission: challenges and solutions; 2021. Availabale from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.08488.
65. Dangi D, Dixit DK, Bhagat A. Sentiment analysis of COVID-19 social media data through machine learning. Multimed Tools Appl. 2022;81(29):42261–42283. doi:10.1007/s11042-022-13492-w
66. Aldosery A, Carruthers R, Kay K, Cave C, Reynolds P, Kostkova P. Enhancing public health response: a framework for topics and sentiment analysis of COVID-19 in the UK using Twitter and the embedded topic model. Front Public Health. 2024;12. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1105383
67. Doraiswamy PM, Blease C, Bodner K. Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: insights from a global physician survey. Artif Intell Med. 2020;102:101753. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101753
68. Coombs NC, Campbell DG, Caringi J. A qualitative study of rural healthcare providers’ views of social, cultural, and programmatic barriers to healthcare access. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22:438. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-07829-2
69. Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N, et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23:689. doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z
70. Lan X, Yu H, Cui L. Application of Telemedicine in COVID-19: a Bibliometric Analysis. Front Public Health. 2022;10:908756. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.908756
71. Dlima SD, Shevade S, Menezes SR, Ganju A. Digital phenotyping in health using machine learning approaches: scoping review. JMIR Bioinform Biotechnol. 2022;3(1):e39618. doi:10.2196/39618
72. Alfalahi H, Dias SB, Khandoker AH, Chaudhuri KR, Hadjileontiadis LJ. A scoping review of neurodegenerative manifestations in explainable digital phenotyping. npj Parkinsons Dis. 2023;9(1):1–22. doi:10.1038/s41531-023-00494-0
73. Subramaniam S, Faisal AI, Deen MJ. Wearable sensor systems for fall risk assessment: a review. Front Digit Health. 2022;4:921506. doi:10.3389/fdgth.2022.921506
74. Ramgopal S, Sanchez-Pinto LN, Horvat CM, Carroll MS, Luo Y, Florin TA. Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support in pediatrics. Pediatr Res. 2023;93(2):334–341. doi:10.1038/s41390-022-02226-1
75. Alanazi A. Clinicians’ views on using artificial intelligence in healthcare: opportunities, challenges, and beyond. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e45255. doi:10.7759/cureus.45255
76. Ferrara E. Fairness and bias in artificial intelligence: a brief survey of sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies. Sci. 2024;6(1):3. doi:10.3390/sci6010003
77. Murdoch B. Privacy and artificial intelligence: challenges for protecting health information in a new era. BMC Medical Ethics. 2021;22(1):122. doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00687-3
78. European Parliament. Directorate General for Parliamentary Research Services. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: issues and Initiatives. Publications Office; 2020. Availabale from: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2861/6644.
79. Nasir S, Khan RA, Bai S. Ethical framework for harnessing the power of AI in healthcare and beyond. IEEE Access. 2024;12:31014–31035. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3369912
80. Holzinger A, Biemann C, Pattichis CS, Kell DB. What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain? arXiv.org; 2017. Availabale from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.09923v1.
81. Mucci A, Green WM, Hill LH. Incorporation of artificial intelligence in healthcare professions and patient education for fostering effective patient care. New Direct Adu Contin Educ. 2024;2024(181):51–62. doi:10.1002/ace.20521
82. Rahman M, Victoros E, Ernest J, Davis R, Shanjana Y, Islam Md R. Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology in healthcare sector: a critical evaluation of both sides of the coin. Clin Med Insights Pathol. 2024;17:2632010X241226887. doi:10.1177/2632010X241226887
83. Da Fonseca AT, Vaz De Sequeira E, Barreto Xavier L. Liability for AI Driven Systems. In: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence and the Law. Springer International Publishing Cham; 2023:9783031412646. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-41264-6
84. Magrabi F, Ammenwerth E, Mcnair JB, et al. Artificial intelligence in clinical decision support: challenges for evaluating AI and practical implications. Yearbook Med Inform. 2019;28:128–134. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1677903
85. Naik N, Hameed BZ, Shetty DK, et al. Legal and ethical consideration in artificial intelligence in healthcare: who takes responsibility? Front Surg. 2022;9:862322. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.862322
86. D’elia A, Gabbay M, Rodgers S, et al. Artificial intelligence and health inequities in primary care: a systematic scoping review and framework. Family Med Comm Health. 2022;10. doi:10.1136/fmch-2022-001670
87. Comunale M, Manera A. The economic impacts and the regulation of AI: a review of the academic literature and policy actions; 2024:65 doi:10.5089/9798400271663.001.
88. Gurevich E, El Hassan B, El Morr C. Equity within AI systems: what can health leaders expect? Healthcare Managem Forum. 2023;36(2):119–124. doi:10.1177/08404704221125368
© 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
Recommended articles
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Radiologists Regarding Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging
Huang W, Li Y, Bao Z, Ye J, Xia W, Lv Y, Lu J, Wang C, Zhu X
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2024, 17:3109-3119
Published Date: 4 July 2024