Graduate Information

Please note: The 2020 & 2021 3MT competitions were suspended due to COVID-19. Information regarding future GRS 3 Minute Thesis competitions is forthcoming.
Workshop for interested participants
Date, time and location are TBD
3MT Final Competition
Date, time and location are TBD
Reception to follow! 1st place, runner up, and people’s choice winners will be announced.
Congratulations to the 2019 3 Minute Thesis Winners!
First Place: Eric Scarffe
Runner Up: Tiffany Dill
People’s Choice: Evan Kristiansen
Overview
The Three Minute Thesis (3MT) competition celebrates the exciting research conducted by Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) students. Developed by The University of Queensland (UQ), the exercise cultivates students’ academic, presentation, and research communication skills.
The competition supports their capacity to effectively explain their research in three minutes, in a language appropriate to a non-specialist audience.
Cash prizes will be awarded to the First Place presenter, Second Place presenter, and a People’s Choice presenter at the final round of the competition.
History
The first 3MT competition was held at UQ in 2008 with 160 students competing. in 2009 and 2010 the 3MT competition was promoted to other Australian and New Zealand universities and enthusiasm for the concept grew. Due to its adoption in numerous universities, a multi-national event was developed, and the Inaugural Trans-Tasman 3MT competition was held at UQ in 2010.
Since 2011 the popularity of the competition has increased and 3MT competitions are now held in over 170 universities across more than 18 countries worldwide. Please see the official 3 Minute Thesis website for more information and to see winning presentations from around the globe.
In November 2013, the first Universities 21 (U21) 3MT competition was held with several universities from around the world competing in a virtual competition.
In March 2016 Boston University held its first 3MT. This was a hugely popular event with 21 participants from 13 different departments showcasing their amazing research.
Eligibility
Active PhD candidates in GRS who have passed their qualifying examinations by the time of the competition are eligible to participate. Graduates are not eligible.
Rules
- A single static PowerPoint slide is permitted. No slide transitions, animations or ‘movement’ of any description are allowed. The slide is to be presented from the beginning of the oration.
- No additional electronic media (e.g. sound and video files) are permitted.
- No additional props (e.g. costumes, musical instruments, laboratory equipment) are permitted.
- Presentations are limited to 3 minutes maximum and competitors exceeding 3 minutes are disqualified.
- Presentations are to be spoken word (e.g. no poems, raps or songs).
- Presentations are to commence from the stage.
- Presentations are considered to have commenced when a presenter starts their presentation through either movement or speech.
- The decision of the adjudicating panel is final.
Judging
At every level of the competition each competitor will be assessed on the judging criteria listed below. Each criterion is equally weighted and has an emphasis on audience.
Comprehension & Content
- Did the presentation provide an understanding of the background to the research question being addressed and its significance?
- Did the presentation clearly describe the key results of the research including conclusions and outcomes?
- Did the presentation follow a clear and logical sequence?
- Was the thesis topic, key results and research significance and outcomes communicated in language appropriate to a non-specialist audience?
- Did the speaker avoid scientific jargon, explain terminology and provide adequate background information to illustrate points?
- Did the presenter spend adequate time on each element of their presentation – or did they elaborate for too long on one aspect or was the presentation rushed?
Engagement & Communication
- Did the oration make the audience want to know more?
- Was the presenter careful not to trivialize or generalize their research?
- Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for their research?
- Did the presenter capture and maintain their audience’s attention?
- Did the speaker have sufficient stage presence, eye contact and vocal range; maintain a steady pace, and have a confident stance?
- Did the PowerPoint slide enhance the presentation – was it clear, legible, and concise?
The 3MT interest form will be posted in early march, with a registration deadline of March 12th.